Pacquiao defeated DK Yoo but could not win

Entering the focal match of the event with the position of the former boxing champion of the world, Manny Pacquiao is almost sure to win against DK Yoo. Many fans also think that Pac-Man can lower their opponents from the first half with their techniques and superior experience.

Pacquiao defeated DK Yoo but could not win - Photo 2
Pacquiao overwhelms DK Yoo in 6 rounds

However, everything took place on the boxing floor in this match was beyond the prediction of all fans. The home advantage helps DK Yoo have many advantages in the match against Pacquiao, from the referee to the shortened competition format that lasts only 2 minutes per half. With a higher level, Pacquiao actively attacked.

Although there is no advantage of height before DK Yoo, Pacquiao still dominates with JAB attacks combined with the back hand to hit the opponent's ribs. On the other side, Yoo's strategy is quite simple with 1-2 punches and proved not too effective. The turning point came in the fourth half, when Pacquiao punched DK Yoo.

Pacquiao's right hook in the fourth half caused DK Yoo to quickly fall to the floor. It seemed that the match would end here, but Yoo continued to stand up to play. But instead of trying to eat tat with PAC Man, Yoo turned to trying to defend, and the time to make the match ended without having to lose.

Pacquiao defeated DK Yoo but could not win - Photo 1
Pac-man has an impressive return but cannot win

DK Yoo's tactics promote efficiency in the fifth half, but he once again poured down in the 6th half. Pacquiao's blow was not recognized, when the referee thought that Yoo fell down due to slipping, not the opponent's blow.

See also  Hanoi Women's Boxing coach accepted to study 'double' to pursue a career

With the referee's judgment, Yoo had more time to stand up before returning to the competition. The match closed with the victory of Pacquiao, when he showed a superior posture in all 6 rounds. However, he could not win because of the arbitrator's controversial ruling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *